Back to Insights

Beyond the Big Names: Boutique Goes Mainstream

– Vatsal Rai

May 17, 2024

Introduction

In the world of investment, brand recognition can be a powerful magnet. Names like Goldman Sachs and Blackstone conjure images of financial titans, wielding vast resources and delivering market-beating returns. However, for discerning investors, a closer look reveals a compelling case for considering boutique asset managers – smaller, nimbler firms that offer distinct advantages often overlooked in the shadow of industry giants. While the allure of well-established players is undeniable, the investment landscape is more nuanced than it may initially appear. Let’s delve deeper into the key reasons why boutique asset managers can represent a strategic choice for your investment portfolio:

Fee Advantage: A Lighter Footprint

One of the most immediate benefits of boutique firms lies in their fee structure. Large institutions often layer on multiple fees, including:

  • Front-end loads: Charges for buying into the fund
  • Back-end loads: Fees for exiting the fund
  • Ongoing management fees: Based on Assets Under Management (AUM)

These fees can eat significantly into your returns over time. On analyzing the 2023 report by the Investment Company Institute (ICI) it can be observed that the average expense ratio (annual percentage of assets deducted for management fees) for actively managed large-cap mutual funds sits at around 1.2%. [1][2]

Boutique firms, with their lower overhead costs, typically offer lower expense ratios of around 0.3%.[3] This translates to substantial savings for investors. To illustrate the benefits of lower fees, a 2023 study by Morningstar, a leading provider of investment research and data, found that a hypothetical investor with a starting balance of $10,000 and a 7% annual return could see a difference of $40,000 in their ending balance after 30 years due solely to a 1% difference in fees.[4] This highlights the significant impact even a small difference in fees can have on compounded returns over time.

In-House Servicing: Deeper Relationships, Better Insights

Investing isn’t just about numbers; it’s about understanding the underlying assets and the people behind them. Large institutions often rely on third-party analysts for due diligence, creating a layer of separation. Boutique firms, on the other hand, can foster closer relationships with borrowers (for debt investments) and companies they invest in (for equity investments) through in-house servicing.

A 2021 survey[5] by the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) found that boutique asset managers are more likely to conduct their own on-site due diligence compared to larger institutions. This direct approach allows for a more thorough understanding of the investment opportunity, potentially leading to superior risk assessment and better returns.

Boutique firms also often maintain a lower advisor-to-client ratio compared to larger firms[7], which translates into a more personalized experience for you as a client. This means that boutique firms can offer a more intimate relationship with your advisor. With fewer clients, but ones who typically have larger portfolios, boutique advisors are more inclined to take a proactive approach to managing your investments and providing tailored advice. If you value a deeper, more personalized relationship with your financial advisor, considering a boutique firm might be the right choice for you.

Better Performance in Volatile Markets

A recent study conducted by Affiliated Managers Group (AMG) has revealed that independent boutique asset managers have consistently outperformed their non-boutique counterparts, especially during periods of increased market volatility. Analyzing over 1,300 individual investment management firms worldwide and nearly 5,000 institutional equity strategies, revealed that independent, active boutique managers outperformed both non-boutiques and index investing over the 20-year period ending December 31, 2019. On average, these boutique managers generated excess annual returns of 82 basis points over indexes, after accounting for fees.[9] These additional returns have the potential to significantly boost wealth accumulation over time.

Spanning two decades from 1999 to 2019, this study also found that boutique asset managers surpassed non-boutiques in 10 out of 11 equity product categories. On average, during times of heightened market volatility, boutique firms outperformed non-boutiques by an impressive 116 basis points.[6] Even in less turbulent market conditions, boutiques maintained an edge, outperforming non-boutiques by 41 basis points on average.[6] This suggests that boutique asset managers have demonstrated a remarkable ability to navigate volatile market conditions and deliver superior returns to their investors.

The Undiscovered Middle Market: A Hunting Ground for Boutique Firms

Large-cap companies, with their established track records and constant analyst scrutiny, often leave fewer hidden opportunities for investors. Boutique asset managers, however, can leverage their agility and research expertise to explore the exciting realm of the undiscovered middle market. This segment encompasses companies typically valued between $2 billion and $10 billion. These firms often boast the potential for significant growth as they navigate their expansion phase. However, compared to their large-cap counterparts, they receive reduced analyst coverage from major investment banks.

This reduced coverage, rather than being a disadvantage, presents an opportunity for boutique asset managers. Their in-depth research capabilities and nimble investment strategies allow them to delve deeper into these companies, potentially uncovering overlooked investment opportunities with promising growth trajectories.

By combining their expertise with a focus on the middle market, boutique firms can potentially deliver superior returns for investors seeking exposure to high-growth potential companies. This approach allows them to move beyond the crowded large-cap space and potentially identify the hidden gems that can fuel long-term investment success.

Focus and Flexibility: Adapting to Changing Markets

Boutique firms, by nature, have a smaller and more agile structure. This translates to quicker decision-making, allowing them to adapt to changing market conditions more readily. They can seize opportunities that may be missed by larger, slower-moving institutions weighed down by bureaucracy. Both large institutional asset managers and individual high-net-worth investors are increasingly turning to boutique investment firms for their unique and innovative active investment strategies. These boutique firms offer a level of agility and specialized domain knowledge that appeals to investors seeking to diversify their portfolios and pursue higher returns.

Boutique investment firms possess a competitive edge in actively managing their portfolios, allowing them to take high conviction positions and provide downside protection. Unlike larger institutional fund managers, boutique firms are solely focused on risk-reward decisions, which often result in alpha-generating returns.[8]

The difference in focus becomes apparent when considering that larger institutional fund managers must contend with non-investment factors and bureaucratic processes, often resulting in slower decision-making processes when buying into or selling out of a position. This can make it challenging for them to react quickly to market changes. Moreover, internal investment policies may restrict their flexibility to diversify away from their core investment focus. Historically, boutique investment firms have demonstrated the ability to outperform the benchmark. Their success is attributed to a combination of factors, including talent, agility, focus, and responsiveness to market opportunities. Boutique firms also excel in building closer client relationships, as many of them are owner-managed, with fund managers holding a significant equity stake in the firm and often investing their own personal assets into their funds. This alignment of interests ensures a commitment to delivering value to investors.

Conclusion

In the investment world dominated by financial titans, boutique asset managers are often overlooked. However, these smaller, nimbler firms offer compelling advantages that savvy investors should consider.

One of the most immediate benefits lies in their fee structures. Large institutions burden investors with multiple layers of fees – upfront charges, exit penalties, and high ongoing management fees based on assets. Boutique firms, operating with lower overhead, typically charge substantially lower fees than their bigger counterparts. This can translate into significant savings over time, turbocharging compounded returns.

While big names rely on third-party analysts, boutiques foster closer relationships through in-house due diligence. This direct approach allows for a deeper understanding of investments, leading to potentially superior risk assessment and returns. Boutiques also maintain lower advisor-to-client ratios, enabling a more personalized experience.

Studies reveal boutique managers have consistently outperformed larger firms, especially during volatile markets. Their agility and specialized strategies demonstrate a remarkable ability to navigate turbulence and deliver excess returns. The realm of the “undiscovered middle market” represents a fertile hunting ground where boutiques can leverage research prowess to uncover high-growth opportunities often overlooked by major players.

At their core, boutique firms exhibit a focus and flexibility that sets them apart. With quicker decision-making unencumbered by bureaucracy, they can seize opportunities and adapt strategies more readily than cumbersome giants. This nimbleness, combined with innovative, high-conviction investing approaches, allows boutiques to pursue alpha-generating returns.

While big brand recognition holds undeniable allure, investors should look beyond the marquee names. Boutique asset managers, with their key strengths, represent a compelling choice for portfolios seeking enhanced returns and adaptability in changing markets.

References

[1] ICI. 2023. “Trends in the Expenses and Fees of Funds, 2022 KEY FINDINGS.” https://www.ici.org/system/files/2023-03/per29-03.pdf

[2] “A Review of Trends and Activities in the Investment Company Industry INVESTMENT COMPANY Www.icifactbook.org.” n.d. https://www.ici.org/system/files/2023-05/2023-factbook.pdf.

[3] Acosta, Francis Nikolai. 2017. “Singapore Boutique Tries Direct Approach.” Fund Selector Asia. October 25, 2017. https://fundselectorasia.com/singapore-boutique-tries-direct-approach/#:~:text=To%20compete%20with%20the%20big.

‌[4] “Do You Know How Fees Impact Performance? | Articles | Morningstar India.” n.d. Www.morningstar.in. Accessed May 7, 2024. https://www.morningstar.in/posts/64745/do-you-know-how-fees-impact-performance.aspx.

‌[5] “YEARBOOK.” n.d. Accessed May 7, 2024. https://nvca.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/NVCA-2024-Yearbook.pdf.

‌[6] “How Small Investment Firms Gain an Edge over Larger Competitors.” n.d. Www.empaxis.com. Accessed May 7, 2024. https://www.empaxis.com/blog/how-smaller-investment-firms-gain-edge-competitors.

[7] Majmudar, Ken. 2021. “Large Brokerage Houses vs Boutique Investment Advisor Firms.” Ridgewood Investments. March 19, 2021. https://ridgewoodinvestments.com/brokerage-house-vs-boutique-advisory.

[8] “Boutique Asset Managers Adapt and Grow in a Turbulent Environment – FIS Blog | FIS.” 2017. FIS Global. 2017. https://www.fisglobal.com/insights/what-we-know/2017/january/boutique-asset-managers-adapt-and-grow-in-a-turbulent-environment.

[9] Acceleration, Fm. 2021. “The Boutique Difference | F/M Acceleration.” May 7, 2021. https://www.fmacceleration.com/the-boutique-difference/.